The richest man in the world
– sometimes, when he isn’t ousted to second place by Bill Gates – is Spain’s
Amancio Ortega. He is estimated
to have 71 thousand million euros as of November last year. (His daughter
Sandra has another 7,600 million). Sr Ortega’s wealth comes from his Inditex fashion group, best known for
its chain of Zara clothing and accessories retail shops (Wiki). He started
pretty much from scratch in around 1950 after leaving school at 14 and finding
employment in ‘the rag trade’; his father a lowly railway worker. He opened his
first Zara shop in 1975.
Inditex itself is doing
exceptionally well, with El País reporting
that ‘Inditex, the group that owns chains like Zara, Oysho or Massimo Dutti,
recorded a strong rise in sales in its first fiscal quarter, from February to
April. Specifically, they stood at 5,569 million euros, up 14% on the same
period in 2016. This led to its profits rising: the net result amounted to 654
million, an increase of 18%...’.
Amancio Ortega has recently
captured the attention of his countrymen after he ‘...donated 320 million euros
specifically for the acquisition of 290 pieces of oncology apparatus. It is one
of the largest philanthropic donations ever made in the country. According to a
statement by the Amancio Ortega Foundation, the charity set up by the
billionaire in 2001, equipment would “allow more accurate diagnoses and provide
patients with less aggressive, more effective and shorter treatments."...’.
(From Newsweek here).
However, not everyone was happy.
‘Why do we reject the
infiltration into public health of Big Business and wealthy magnates? Asks Nueva Tribuna here.
El Mundo reports
that some public health associations say that the gift should be returned, as
‘We aim towards adequate financing of our needs through a progressive tax system
that redistributes resources prioritizing public health’, rather, they say,
than through a gift which – while a huge
amount – is small compared to the 1,256 million in dividends earmarked to go to
Ortega from Inditex this year.
So, for Sr Ortega, perhaps
the donation is a small thing: perhaps it is an exercise in self-promotion or a
sop towards his creative tax activities. Should we accept such largess? Perhaps
a better question might be – shouldn’t we encourage it?
No comments:
Post a Comment